<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Van Helsing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2004/12/18/van-helsing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2004/12/18/van-helsing/</link>
	<description>Film Forensic Investigations &#38; Autopsies Our Specialty</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 05:49:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: shellshear</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2004/12/18/van-helsing/comment-page-1/#comment-70530</link>
		<dc:creator>shellshear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 07:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/wordpress/?p=18#comment-70530</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t seen Ghostrider yet, but it&#039;s definitely square in the middle of my purview.  If I happen upon a copy cheaply, I&#039;ll do it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t seen Ghostrider yet, but it&#8217;s definitely square in the middle of my purview.  If I happen upon a copy cheaply, I&#8217;ll do it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phoenix</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2004/12/18/van-helsing/comment-page-1/#comment-70509</link>
		<dc:creator>phoenix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/wordpress/?p=18#comment-70509</guid>
		<description>So...if you feel inspired to do a FF of Ghostrider...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230;if you feel inspired to do a FF of Ghostrider&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phoenix</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2004/12/18/van-helsing/comment-page-1/#comment-70508</link>
		<dc:creator>phoenix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/wordpress/?p=18#comment-70508</guid>
		<description>After being introduced to the site through mezzacotta, I thoroughly enjoyed a number of movie rewrites here.

In fact, I&#039;m seriously considering a rewrite of Ghostrider, if only for one thing at the ending where I think they really missed the boat... :)

Thanks for these enjoyable thoughts. And, in keeping with where I&#039;m commenting, I must say that Van Helsing is one of my guilty pleasures when it comes to movies...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After being introduced to the site through mezzacotta, I thoroughly enjoyed a number of movie rewrites here.</p>
<p>In fact, I&#8217;m seriously considering a rewrite of Ghostrider, if only for one thing at the ending where I think they really missed the boat&#8230; <img src='http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Thanks for these enjoyable thoughts. And, in keeping with where I&#8217;m commenting, I must say that Van Helsing is one of my guilty pleasures when it comes to movies&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shellshear</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2004/12/18/van-helsing/comment-page-1/#comment-2277</link>
		<dc:creator>shellshear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 06:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/wordpress/?p=18#comment-2277</guid>
		<description>Certainly not!  I realise I\&#039;ve been a bit quiet on FF, due to stupid work stuff, but I do have a couple of partially written reviews, including Snakes on a Plane and National Treasure (which, I agree, is quite good.  A lot better than I was expecting, and surprisingly a lot better than The Da Vinci Code).
Feel free to keep commenting - you\&#039;re the website\&#039;s one regular visitor (other than people who personally know me), I think, and are therefore our most valuable \&quot;customer\&quot;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly not!  I realise I\&#8217;ve been a bit quiet on FF, due to stupid work stuff, but I do have a couple of partially written reviews, including Snakes on a Plane and National Treasure (which, I agree, is quite good.  A lot better than I was expecting, and surprisingly a lot better than The Da Vinci Code).<br />
Feel free to keep commenting &#8211; you\&#8217;re the website\&#8217;s one regular visitor (other than people who personally know me), I think, and are therefore our most valuable \&#8221;customer\&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annav</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2004/12/18/van-helsing/comment-page-1/#comment-2274</link>
		<dc:creator>Annav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/wordpress/?p=18#comment-2274</guid>
		<description>Are you tired of me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you tired of me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annav</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2004/12/18/van-helsing/comment-page-1/#comment-1832</link>
		<dc:creator>Annav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 22:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/wordpress/?p=18#comment-1832</guid>
		<description>Sorry just click on Annav.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry just click on Annav.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annav</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2004/12/18/van-helsing/comment-page-1/#comment-1827</link>
		<dc:creator>Annav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 15:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/wordpress/?p=18#comment-1827</guid>
		<description>Never mind it&#039;s at http://valerous.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never mind it&#8217;s at <a href="http://valerous.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://valerous.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annav</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2004/12/18/van-helsing/comment-page-1/#comment-1826</link>
		<dc:creator>Annav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 15:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/wordpress/?p=18#comment-1826</guid>
		<description>I like the movie Van Helsing so much that I made up a quiz about. I have 241 questions all with answers. Some of them are at http://valerious.blogsopt.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the movie Van Helsing so much that I made up a quiz about. I have 241 questions all with answers. Some of them are at <a href="http://valerious.blogsopt.com" rel="nofollow">http://valerious.blogsopt.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annav</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2004/12/18/van-helsing/comment-page-1/#comment-1694</link>
		<dc:creator>Annav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 14:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/wordpress/?p=18#comment-1694</guid>
		<description>I am AGHAST that Hugh Jackman was in musicals like &quot;Beauty and the Beast&quot; and &quot;The Boy from Oz&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am AGHAST that Hugh Jackman was in musicals like &#8220;Beauty and the Beast&#8221; and &#8220;The Boy from Oz&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shellshear</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2004/12/18/van-helsing/comment-page-1/#comment-1678</link>
		<dc:creator>shellshear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 01:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/wordpress/?p=18#comment-1678</guid>
		<description>Hugh Jackman is pretty damn fine - there were quite a few eyebrows raised [1], though, when he was chosen for the part: until X-Men he was best-known for being in musicals - Beauty and the Beast, Oklahoma, and notably &quot;The Boy from Oz&quot;, a musical biopic of Peter Allen.  Some of the X-Men fans were *aghast*.  

Then they saw the film.  I must admit, I had my doubts too, but I had confidence in Bryan Singer - I figured after The Usual Suspects he should be allowed to do whatever the hell he liked [2].  And, of course, Mr Jackman was excellent.  Wolverine could have been so very, very bad with stereotypical hollywood casting (eg. a professional wrestler.)

[1] - In hollywood, this is a more-than-usually ambiguous phrase.
[2] - OK, Apt Pupil was fun and capable but not genius.  It didn&#039;t, however, use up any of his goodwill points.  Incidentally, I was - here&#039;s that word again - aghast to see what Bryan Singer looked like.  He&#039;s a kid!  A fucking kid!  I was so certain he was in his 60s at least, a grizzled old man who&#039;d seen too much too young, and who had eked out a living as the pilot of a cessna in Patagonia for the last twenty years, before trying his hand at directing. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hugh Jackman is pretty damn fine &#8211; there were quite a few eyebrows raised [1], though, when he was chosen for the part: until X-Men he was best-known for being in musicals &#8211; Beauty and the Beast, Oklahoma, and notably &#8220;The Boy from Oz&#8221;, a musical biopic of Peter Allen.  Some of the X-Men fans were *aghast*.  </p>
<p>Then they saw the film.  I must admit, I had my doubts too, but I had confidence in Bryan Singer &#8211; I figured after The Usual Suspects he should be allowed to do whatever the hell he liked [2].  And, of course, Mr Jackman was excellent.  Wolverine could have been so very, very bad with stereotypical hollywood casting (eg. a professional wrestler.)</p>
<p>[1] &#8211; In hollywood, this is a more-than-usually ambiguous phrase.<br />
[2] &#8211; OK, Apt Pupil was fun and capable but not genius.  It didn&#8217;t, however, use up any of his goodwill points.  Incidentally, I was &#8211; here&#8217;s that word again &#8211; aghast to see what Bryan Singer looked like.  He&#8217;s a kid!  A fucking kid!  I was so certain he was in his 60s at least, a grizzled old man who&#8217;d seen too much too young, and who had eked out a living as the pilot of a cessna in Patagonia for the last twenty years, before trying his hand at directing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
