<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pride &#038; Prejudice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2006/06/07/pride-prejudice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2006/06/07/pride-prejudice/</link>
	<description>Film Forensic Investigations &#038; Autopsies Our Specialty</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: shellshear</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2006/06/07/pride-prejudice/#comment-2022</link>
		<dc:creator>shellshear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 23:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2006/06/07/pride-prejudice/#comment-2022</guid>
		<description>That's interesting - there is certainly a subtheme of vampire movies that is about the woman choosing the boring good man or the exciting villain, which is certainly in common with P&#038;P.  That's a very workable angle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s interesting - there is certainly a subtheme of vampire movies that is about the woman choosing the boring good man or the exciting villain, which is certainly in common with P&#038;P.  That&#8217;s a very workable angle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emmajeans</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2006/06/07/pride-prejudice/#comment-2019</link>
		<dc:creator>emmajeans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 05:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2006/06/07/pride-prejudice/#comment-2019</guid>
		<description>the point about sex/death being at the heart of vampire movies; but not at the core of P&#38;P is true, I think. However, I know a good many people who rate death as preferential to getting married, so there is that angle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the point about sex/death being at the heart of vampire movies; but not at the core of P&amp;P is true, I think. However, I know a good many people who rate death as preferential to getting married, so there is that angle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shellshear</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2006/06/07/pride-prejudice/#comment-1896</link>
		<dc:creator>shellshear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 18:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2006/06/07/pride-prejudice/#comment-1896</guid>
		<description>It's an interesting point - we'd want something like a guest book, I suppose.
That should be doable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an interesting point - we&#8217;d want something like a guest book, I suppose.<br />
That should be doable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Clam</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2006/06/07/pride-prejudice/#comment-1885</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Clam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 23:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2006/06/07/pride-prejudice/#comment-1885</guid>
		<description>You need a place for 'general comments' on Film Forensics.

For instance, how about a Film Forensics haiku section?

In 'What Lies Beneath'
How could Harrison Ford's wife
Not be the killer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You need a place for &#8216;general comments&#8217; on Film Forensics.</p>
<p>For instance, how about a Film Forensics haiku section?</p>
<p>In &#8216;What Lies Beneath&#8217;<br />
How could Harrison Ford&#8217;s wife<br />
Not be the killer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anotherblog &#187; Ottawa</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2006/06/07/pride-prejudice/#comment-1883</link>
		<dc:creator>Anotherblog &#187; Ottawa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 21:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2006/06/07/pride-prejudice/#comment-1883</guid>
		<description>[...] om being weak about jet-lag. 	Still, I&#8217;m pretty stuffed right now. 	Also, I posted a FF I did on the plane.  							 				  			  			 				 		 No Comments yet  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] om being weak about jet-lag. 	Still, I&#8217;m pretty stuffed right now. 	Also, I posted a FF I did on the plane.  							</p>
<p> No Comments yet<br />
 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shellshear</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2006/06/07/pride-prejudice/#comment-1881</link>
		<dc:creator>shellshear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 15:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2006/06/07/pride-prejudice/#comment-1881</guid>
		<description>One of the internal conflicts of this version of P&#38;P is that vampire films are (often) about sex/death, and P&#38;P... isn't.  Not really.  It would be tempting but incorrect, I think, for the sex/death to become front and centre: the core of the story must still be Elizabeth vs. Darcy.  We don't want Elizabeth's choice to be sexy Wickham vs. repressed Darcy - that's too easy a cliche, and Darcy *is* supposed to be sexy, not the second-choice family-man of vampire films.

I'm not saying that the sex/death angle should be ignored - I think it's the most powerful element of vampire films - but it has to be very carefully handled in this kind of film.  There are *lots* of potential pitfalls to this film, many sure steps that must be taken to avoid it being an utter disaster.  On the bright side, I think that if it does avoid being a disaster, it'd be brilliant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the internal conflicts of this version of P&amp;P is that vampire films are (often) about sex/death, and P&amp;P&#8230; isn&#8217;t.  Not really.  It would be tempting but incorrect, I think, for the sex/death to become front and centre: the core of the story must still be Elizabeth vs. Darcy.  We don&#8217;t want Elizabeth&#8217;s choice to be sexy Wickham vs. repressed Darcy - that&#8217;s too easy a cliche, and Darcy *is* supposed to be sexy, not the second-choice family-man of vampire films.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying that the sex/death angle should be ignored - I think it&#8217;s the most powerful element of vampire films - but it has to be very carefully handled in this kind of film.  There are *lots* of potential pitfalls to this film, many sure steps that must be taken to avoid it being an utter disaster.  On the bright side, I think that if it does avoid being a disaster, it&#8217;d be brilliant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: winston</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2006/06/07/pride-prejudice/#comment-1874</link>
		<dc:creator>winston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 07:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2006/06/07/pride-prejudice/#comment-1874</guid>
		<description>It's so crazy it just might work!

Just one question: Would there be more heaving of bosom and bodice ripping in this version? Enquiring rakes wish to know.

BTW, in the last few weeks I watched the BBC version. I enjoyed it very much, but think I'd rather sit down with P&#38;P lite. While the longer version keeps more of the books incidents, I don't believe it captures the essence of the book any better than the recent movie.

You really ought to pitch this to the Hollywood money-men before someone else does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s so crazy it just might work!</p>
<p>Just one question: Would there be more heaving of bosom and bodice ripping in this version? Enquiring rakes wish to know.</p>
<p>BTW, in the last few weeks I watched the BBC version. I enjoyed it very much, but think I&#8217;d rather sit down with P&amp;P lite. While the longer version keeps more of the books incidents, I don&#8217;t believe it captures the essence of the book any better than the recent movie.</p>
<p>You really ought to pitch this to the Hollywood money-men before someone else does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Clam</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2006/06/07/pride-prejudice/#comment-1871</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Clam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 04:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2006/06/07/pride-prejudice/#comment-1871</guid>
		<description>I love it! You are a genius. Your name deserves to be written across the 21st century in letters of fire a thousand miles high. This movie must be made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love it! You are a genius. Your name deserves to be written across the 21st century in letters of fire a thousand miles high. This movie must be made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
