<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RoboCop 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2007/09/30/robocop-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2007/09/30/robocop-2/</link>
	<description>Film Forensic Investigations &#038; Autopsies Our Specialty</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: shellshear</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2007/09/30/robocop-2/#comment-19363</link>
		<dc:creator>shellshear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 07:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2007/09/30/robocop-2/#comment-19363</guid>
		<description>I've always been a fan of the "theme + variants" school of creativity, and (although it's been a long time) I do remember liking the variation on Robocop's Laws, which seemed like a marvelous bit of satire at committee-think.  
I agree with you about the other elements, such as the humour.  It seemed funny at the time, but it was also clearly not a well-thought out part of the future, and that detracted from the setting.  It might have worked if the film had been more explicitly a comedy and had gone further in exploring the throwaway bits of brutality it shows, but that would have required it to be a satire with actual bite.  The studio would never have allowed it to deviate that far from the original.
Would have been interesting, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always been a fan of the &#8220;theme + variants&#8221; school of creativity, and (although it&#8217;s been a long time) I do remember liking the variation on Robocop&#8217;s Laws, which seemed like a marvelous bit of satire at committee-think.<br />
I agree with you about the other elements, such as the humour.  It seemed funny at the time, but it was also clearly not a well-thought out part of the future, and that detracted from the setting.  It might have worked if the film had been more explicitly a comedy and had gone further in exploring the throwaway bits of brutality it shows, but that would have required it to be a satire with actual bite.  The studio would never have allowed it to deviate that far from the original.<br />
Would have been interesting, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
