<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Film Forensics &#187; shellshear</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/category/authors/shellshear/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy</link>
	<description>Film Forensic Investigations &#38; Autopsies Our Specialty</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 22:22:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Inglourious Basterds</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2009/09/01/inglourious-basterds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2009/09/01/inglourious-basterds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shellshear</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forensic Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shellshear]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2009/09/01/inglourious-basterds/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[State of Body Slightly scalped. Nothing serious, really. Oh, and there&#8217;s a bit of a cut on the forehead; hopefully won&#8217;t scar too much. Detail of Inspection Inspected once. Forensic Investigator Shellshear Comments Brilliant, except very slightly implausible towards the end bit of the film. I usually try to suggest changes to films that are [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2009/09/01/inglourious-basterds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Watchmen</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2009/03/06/watchmen/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2009/03/06/watchmen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 04:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shellshear</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comic Book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slash'n'dash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[W]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shellshear]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2009/03/06/watchmen/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One hour into Watchmen, I thought it was going to beat out Dark Knight as my favourite superhero film. I didn&#8217;t expect much. The graphic novel is dense and long and literary, and although 300 (the director&#8217;s previous film) was visually lush, I wasn&#8217;t moved by it. I knew it was going to be pretty [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2009/03/06/watchmen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pride and Extreme Prejudice</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2009/02/19/pride-and-prejudice-against-the-undead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2009/02/19/pride-and-prejudice-against-the-undead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shellshear</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shellshear]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2009/02/19/pride-and-prejudice-against-the-undead/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Astute readers may recall a 2006 Film Forensic about how Pride and Prejudice might be improved with vampires. Recently, someone decided it would be a better Zombie story. And now, please welcome to the stage: Pride and Predator. Yaaaaaaay!]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2009/02/19/pride-and-prejudice-against-the-undead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dollhouse, Episode 1</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2009/02/19/dollhouse-episode-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2009/02/19/dollhouse-episode-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shellshear</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slash'n'dash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shellshear]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/?p=95</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I watched the first episode of Joss Whedon&#8217;s new &#8220;Dollhouse&#8221; TV series the other day. While it wasn&#8217;t particularly exciting in itself, and it doesn&#8217;t really sell the raison d&#8217;etre, I can see some good SF potential. It posits a pretty big SF idea: that it&#8217;s possible to read and write memories and personality, and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2009/02/19/dollhouse-episode-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Am Legend</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2008/06/23/i-am-legend/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2008/06/23/i-am-legend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shellshear</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[I]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slash'n'dash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zombies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shellshear]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/?p=91</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some thoughts on the ending. Once again, I am drawn to a film with a downer ending. In this case, not only is it an unsatisfying downer (cf. The Mist) but it was also clearly changed, as confirmed by the release of the original ending. I don&#8217;t think the original ending is much good either. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2008/06/23/i-am-legend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Mist</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2008/02/12/the-mist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2008/02/12/the-mist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 06:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shellshear</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Horror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slash'n'dash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shellshear]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2008/02/12/the-mist/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some thoughts on the ending&#8230; I&#8217;ve had a remarkable run of films lately. The last four of five films at the cinema I&#8217;ve seen had unambiguously downer endings. Now, going to see a Steven King horror film, you might say that I had this one coming. And fair enough. But dammit, I really don&#8217;t like [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2008/02/12/the-mist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Country For Old Men</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2008/01/02/no-country-for-old-men/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2008/01/02/no-country-for-old-men/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 23:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shellshear</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Drama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slash'n'dash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shellshear]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2008/01/02/no-country-for-old-men/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few thoughts on why I should definitely not be put in charge of this kind of material&#8230; I didn&#8217;t enjoy No Country For Old Men. Sadly, I&#8217;m one of the uncultured masses who likes happy endings or, at least, satisfying endings. The ending of Monty Python and the Holy Grail (everyone gets arrested just [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2008/01/02/no-country-for-old-men/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snakes on a Plane</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2007/05/21/snakes-on-a-plane/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2007/05/21/snakes-on-a-plane/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 13:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shellshear</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forensic Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shellshear]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2007/05/21/snakes-on-a-plane/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[State of body Oooooooh, where to start. Um, dead? Yeah. Very dead. Strange puncture wounds. Mysterious. Detail of inspection Inspected once. Forensic Investigator shellshear Comments So much potential! Well, I thought so anyway. A classic example of a movie playing it far too safe; of failing to properly explore the premise. &#8220;Look!&#8221; I said to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2007/05/21/snakes-on-a-plane/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hostel</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2006/07/26/hostel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2006/07/26/hostel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 23:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shellshear</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Forensic Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shellshear]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2006/07/26/hostel/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[State of body Um, well. Where to begin? Elaborately tortured, of course, but oddly, cause of death was old age. Detail of inspection Inspected once. Forensic Investigator shellshear Comments People aren&#8217;t exactly looking for watertight plots in a horror film, but in this case, more attention to the scenario might have made a more interesting [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2006/07/26/hostel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pride &amp; Prejudice</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2006/06/07/pride-prejudice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2006/06/07/pride-prejudice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 18:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shellshear</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Drama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forensic Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[P]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shellshear]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2006/06/07/pride-prejudice/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[State of body Utterly pristine. Detail of inspection Inspected six times. Forensic Investigator shellshear Comments The body appears to have been desecrated by person or persons unknown. Well, OK, maybe not unknown. It was me. The autopsy was presumptuous &#038; pointless. But fun. I&#8217;m rather sensitive to the perception that Film Forensics is a negative [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2006/06/07/pride-prejudice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
