<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Film Forensics &#187; Action</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/category/genres/action/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy</link>
	<description>Film Forensic Investigations &#38; Autopsies Our Specialty</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 22:22:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Men In Black II</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2009/09/12/men-in-black-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2009/09/12/men-in-black-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 08:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shellshear</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forensic Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/?p=149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[State of Body Initial head trauma. Internal investigation showed that certain vital organs appear to have been replaced with underperforming replicas. Detail of Inspection Once, with occasional clip viewings on cable. Forensic Investigator Michael Stangeland Comments A potentially good movie ruined by some bad story decisions. Men in Black was a fun movie that got [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2009/09/12/men-in-black-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inglourious Basterds</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2009/09/01/inglourious-basterds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2009/09/01/inglourious-basterds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shellshear</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forensic Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shellshear]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2009/09/01/inglourious-basterds/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[State of Body Slightly scalped. Nothing serious, really. Oh, and there&#8217;s a bit of a cut on the forehead; hopefully won&#8217;t scar too much. Detail of Inspection Inspected once. Forensic Investigator Shellshear Comments Brilliant, except very slightly implausible towards the end bit of the film. I usually try to suggest changes to films that are [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2009/09/01/inglourious-basterds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Terminator Salvation</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2009/07/24/terminator-salvation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2009/07/24/terminator-salvation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 01:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shishberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forensic Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shishberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/?p=126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[State of Body Innards ripped out and replaced with machinery that is tougher, louder and more futuristic, but ultimately non-functional. Detail of Inspection Inspected once. Forensic Investigator Shishberg Comments Impressive in some ways, but not any of the ways that made T1 and T2 great. The Terminator franchise is at its best when it sticks [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2009/07/24/terminator-salvation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Watchmen</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2009/03/06/watchmen/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2009/03/06/watchmen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 04:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shellshear</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comic Book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slash'n'dash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[W]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shellshear]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2009/03/06/watchmen/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One hour into Watchmen, I thought it was going to beat out Dark Knight as my favourite superhero film. I didn&#8217;t expect much. The graphic novel is dense and long and literary, and although 300 (the director&#8217;s previous film) was visually lush, I wasn&#8217;t moved by it. I knew it was going to be pretty [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2009/03/06/watchmen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dollhouse, Episode 1</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2009/02/19/dollhouse-episode-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2009/02/19/dollhouse-episode-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shellshear</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slash'n'dash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shellshear]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/?p=95</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I watched the first episode of Joss Whedon&#8217;s new &#8220;Dollhouse&#8221; TV series the other day. While it wasn&#8217;t particularly exciting in itself, and it doesn&#8217;t really sell the raison d&#8217;etre, I can see some good SF potential. It posits a pretty big SF idea: that it&#8217;s possible to read and write memories and personality, and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2009/02/19/dollhouse-episode-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fantastic Four</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2007/11/30/fantastic-four/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2007/11/30/fantastic-four/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 12:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>winstoninabox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alphabetical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comic Book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forensic Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[winston]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2007/12/01/fantastic-four/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[State of body A super-powered corpse that won&#8217;t trouble you with too many deeper questions. Detail of Inspection Inspected twice. Forensic Investigator winstoninabox Comments Family friendly fun. Fantastic Four (2005) is a guilty pleasure. While I&#8217;ve read some Fantastic Four comics in my teens I&#8217;m not a rabid fan. So this FF on the FF [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2007/11/30/fantastic-four/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Highlander: The Source</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2007/11/28/highlander-the-source/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2007/11/28/highlander-the-source/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shellshear</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fantasy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forensic Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2007/11/28/highlander-the-source/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[State of Body Not so much decapitated as cut off at the knees. Detail of Inspection Inspected twice, with the body parts in distinctly different arrangements. Forensic Investigator Jon Blum Comments How hard is it to make a sequel when nobody watched the last one? Ah, Highlander. Fifteen years ago I was introduced to you [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2007/11/28/highlander-the-source/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RoboCop 3</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2007/10/31/robocop-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2007/10/31/robocop-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 12:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>winstoninabox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alphabetical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forensic Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[winston]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2007/10/31/robocop-3/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[State of Body Worked over pretty bad and then neutered. Detail of Inspection Inspected 3 or 4 times. Probably this time was watching it for the last time I ever will in this lifetime. Forensic Investigator winstoninabox Comments How hard is it to make a sequel? You just have to copy the first one, don&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2007/10/31/robocop-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RoboCop 2</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2007/09/30/robocop-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2007/09/30/robocop-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 06:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>winstoninabox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alphabetical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forensic Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[winston]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2007/09/30/robocop-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[State of Body Like so many other sequels this much maligned corpse can&#8217;t escape negative comparisons to its far superior progenitor. Detail of Inspection Inspected 4 or 5 times. Difficult to remember after such a long hiatus. Forensic Investigator winstoninabox Comments How hard is it to make a sequel? You just have to copy the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2007/09/30/robocop-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Die Hard 4.0</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2007/08/30/die-hard-40/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2007/08/30/die-hard-40/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 09:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>winstoninabox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alphabetical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forensic Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[winston]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2007/08/30/die-hard-40/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[State of Body Certainly not stale, but as this corpse was always going to be a success it could have taken a few more risks. Detail of Inspection Inspected once. Forensic Investigator winstoninabox Comments Fun, but can&#8217;t make it to the next level. What more could one expect with &#8220;4&#8243; in the title? That&#8217;s what [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2007/08/30/die-hard-40/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
