<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Film Forensics &#187; Thriller</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/category/genres/thriller/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy</link>
	<description>Film Forensic Investigations &#38; Autopsies Our Specialty</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 22:22:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Memento &#8211; second impressions</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2007/10/03/memento-second-impressions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2007/10/03/memento-second-impressions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 05:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shellshear</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[David Morgan-Mar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forensic Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thriller]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2007/10/03/memento-second-impressions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Morgan-Mar continues his experiment, having now watched the film in the intended order&#8230; The Second Viewing Having viewed the film in chronological order and typed up everything above, I rewatched the film a day later, in the canonical order. The goal was to see how my impression of the film would change, watching it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2007/10/03/memento-second-impressions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Memento &#8211; in chronological order</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2007/10/02/memento-in-chronological-order/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2007/10/02/memento-in-chronological-order/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 06:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shellshear</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alphabetical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Morgan-Mar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forensic Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thriller]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2007/10/02/memento-in-chronological-order/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Guest reviewer David Morgan-Mar, having never seen the film Memento, watches it in the re-edited chronological order! The Idea The 2000 film Memento, directed by Christopher Nolan, sits comfortably within IMDB&#8217;s Top 250 films list. It is regarded as something of a classic work of film. Despite this, prior to 1 October 2007, I had [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2007/10/02/memento-in-chronological-order/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Da Vinci Code</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2006/06/12/the-da-vinci-code/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2006/06/12/the-da-vinci-code/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 13:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>winstoninabox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forensic Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thriller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[winston]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2006/06/12/the-da-vinci-code/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[State of Body Congealed sangreal. Detail of Inspection Inspected once. Forensic Investigator winstoninabox Comments A bloated corpse. This dissection will have two parts. In part the first the subject will be examined and there will be some minor slicing for brevity. In part the second weâ€™ll look at something a bit more FFish. Let begin [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2006/06/12/the-da-vinci-code/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paycheck</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2005/12/19/paycheck/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2005/12/19/paycheck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2005 23:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>winstoninabox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Forensic Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[P]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thriller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[winston]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2005/12/19/paycheck/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[State of Body Not so fresh, but not completely stale. Detail of Inspection Inspected twice. Forensic Investigator winstoninabox Comments Could have had Hitchcock confusion, but instead ends up just a little Woozy. I enjoyed Paycheck. It is a passable action movie that unfortunately squanders an excellent premise. Michael Jennings (Ben Affleck) is a reverse engineer [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2005/12/19/paycheck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Secret Window</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2004/12/27/secret-window/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2004/12/27/secret-window/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2004 11:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shellshear</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Horror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thriller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shellshear]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/wordpress/?p=21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[State of body One could only call it badly decomposed if it was actually composed in the first place. Detail of inspection Inspected once. Forensic Investigator shellshear Comments Corpse was found buried in a garden. Not, however, nearly buried well enough. Appeared to have been dug up a number of times previously. â€œSecret Windowâ€, despite [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2004/12/27/secret-window/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Village</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2004/10/28/the-village/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2004/10/28/the-village/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2004 08:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>winstoninabox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Thriller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[winston]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/wordpress/?p=15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[State of Body Cause of death unknown, but suspected to be culture shock. Detail of Inspection Inspected once. Forensic Investigator winstoninabox Comments Subject appeared to have been somewhat deranged. Had a big target painted in red on chest, with the words &#8220;Suckers!&#8221; written on it. As with other M. Night Shyamalan films, I liked â€œThe [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2004/10/28/the-village/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Signs</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2004/10/25/signs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2004/10/25/signs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2004 08:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shellshear</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thriller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shellshear]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/wordpress/?p=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[State of body Much to our surprise, what we thought was a body turned out to be a cunningly carved giant carrot. Detail of inspection Inspected once. Forensic Investigator shellshear Comments Extremely perplexing why someone would have gone to such incredible effort in carefully crafting this pseudo-body, since it had decayed almost to nothing by [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2004/10/25/signs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Bourne Supremacy</title>
		<link>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2004/10/05/the-bourne-supremacy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2004/10/05/the-bourne-supremacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2004 10:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shellshear</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thriller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shellshear]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmforensics.com/wordpress/?p=11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[State of body Appeared to be a fit young man, but worn out through too many repetitions of the same exercise. On closer inspection, a great deal older than he first appeared. Detail of inspection Inspected once. Forensic Investigator shellshear Comments Some confusion about what happened to the body &#8211; it disappeared before autopsy proper [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmforensics.com/autopsy/2004/10/05/the-bourne-supremacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
